Methodical approach and solid structure are key success factors when writing a high-quality education paper. Whatever institution or topic we take, it is crucial that students could demonstrate in their works the abilities to present their thoughts in a structured manner and to provide detailed meaningful descriptions. This is why writing an education paper is a task everyone studying in higher forms comes across often. It can be prepared for a chemistry or a political science class, but in any case, there are some general standards such work should follow.
Education paper structure corresponds with its purpose to demonstrate how its author conducts proper research and to present the results in a clear and organized format. So it follows the path of a research starting with introduction into the problem, list of starting conditions and researcher’s goals, proceeds with the descriptions of steps taken to achieve these goals and ends with a list of the research results, usually accompanied with an overview of further assumptions, limitations and other concerns, for example to refer to planned future research on the same problem.
How to write a good education paper
Let us explore the main sections of a typical education paper structure in detail.
Typically does not take more than 150 words. A general overview of the problem context must be provided.
Describes what is actually researched in this education paper, typically includes the author’s expectations and initial assumptions.
Scope of the study
Lists the specific parts of the problem which the researcher will focus on. Most probably some areas will be omitted so this should be explained in this section.
Describes the processes of data collection, calculation, and analysis in detail. At this stage, the researcher’s approach to the problem can be evaluated.
This section is important for an in-depth exploration of the problem context, especially when many similar pieces of research already exist. In that case, the author needs to explain what is the novelty of this education paper, highlighting what was insufficient in these earlier results to find the solution to the selected problem.
The actual process of the research is to be displayed here, step by step.
Reviews the research results and states that the goals have been achieved. May also contain arguments for performing deeper research on the problem, in future papers.
The reference section of the education paper. Typically used together with an in-text citation system. Any education paper as well as any full-scale scientific work demands giving proper credit to all valid data sources which have been used to write it. Of course, no reference is needed for common facts such as seasonal changes in natural light or end of WW2 but specific facts known to a limited audience only ought to be backed by solid references.
Large tables, charts or other types of data relevant for this research are to be put here. It is better to avoid putting such content within the main text so that a reader would not shift their attention focus. Instead, references to this section are put wherever appropriate.
Additional hints on how to write education paper
While it is crucial to follow these structural requirements, there still is much choice left for a student to decide how to write education paper: each problem can be regarded from many different angles, various kinds of data collection can be used and as for assumptions made in the areas of insufficient data, they usually are up to a researcher. After all, a seemingly evident solution is not always the right one. Of course, all of that should be based upon solid arguments. General guidelines for the content of an education paper are as follows:
- Straightforward manner without unnecessarily overcomplicated descriptions.
- Going from facts (data) to assumptions, not vice versa.
- Using formal logic and academic research methods.
- Avoiding emotions or personal approach in descriptions.
The core part of an education paper is the student’s work including measurements, calculations, data analysis or other necessary operations to solve the main problem of their research. This content needs to be properly arranged so that readers could follow all the steps of the research process. Calculations must be followed by the structured display of the results and their connection to the previous part of the paper should be clear enough: thus, big gaps between numbers and assumptions based on them can make it difficult to follow for a reader and result in too many questions. Furthermore, a clear conclusion is necessary, summarizing all of these results to give a solution to the proposed problem or make other statements about it, e.g. highlighting the lack of available data to solve it.
Deeper into details: An education paper example
Let us make a brief review of an education paper sample, with the following topic: “Health effects of vaping propagation among the population of Newtown city, NY, US”. First of all, its abstract should address the growing concern against vaping practices. In the introduction part, the author should state their mission to contribute to the understanding of consequences. The problem would be to find a positive correlation between frequent vaping and health issues.
Furthermore, the methodology section should describe which statistical data would be retrieved and how, what methods would be used to analyze it and what would be the criteria of the research completion. In our case, medical statistics will be compared with vaping liquids sales data, with a breakdown on different social and age groups. In the main section, these numbers would undergo statistical operations and a positive (or negative) correlation between both trends is to be displayed, providing the ground for an assumption about the probability of vaping affecting (or not affecting) the population’s health.
A focus group of Newtown citizens would also be interviewed about their usage of vaping devices and their health problems, in order to support the conclusion with additional material from an alternative source. Limitations and biases of different ways of data collection will be listed in appropriate sections, followed by assumptions and by comparison with results from other related works by other authors.